Why Swedish dealership groups lose a week every month to data they already own

mercedes-amg

Trusted by startups and enterprises:

 IT COUNTRY PARTNER FOR B&H

ZenDev <> ICA
A new dedicated tech hub in Sarajevo.

We've partnered with ICA, one of Scandinavia's largest brands, as IT Country Partner in Bosnia and Herzegovina. We're hiring 100+ engineers, designers, and specialists for a long-term collaboration supporting ICA across their retail, banking, and insurance operations.
 

Ica - ZenDev

It's Friday afternoon. Someone at your dealership logs into the OEM portal, downloads a CSV, strips out 11 irrelevant columns, renames a few fields, and pastes everything into a report template built two years ago by someone who no longer works there.

This happens every week. At most large Swedish dealer groups, it happens at every location.

The data exists. You have it. The problem is that it lives in 4 different systems, none of which talk to each other by default. And so the work of making sense of it falls on your people, every single week, manually.

The manual reporting tax no one talks about


According to Cox Automotive's Power of Data Study, 70% of dealerships say lags in real-time data make their insights less useful. 54% have experienced conflicting figures across multiple internal sources.

That's not a technology gap. That's a workflow tax, paid every week in hours.

TARGIT, which works with 400+ dealer groups across Europe, documented one case where a group spent a full week per month just handling DMS data before any reporting could happen. Another group tracked 30-45 minutes per accountant per day on manual reports. At one location. Multiply that across a network of 200 dealerships and the math gets uncomfortable quickly.

McKinsey's 2025 study on automotive sales productivity found that employees across the industry spend up to 20% of their working week searching for information. Not analysing it. Searching for it. The vehicles are sold. The revenue is real. 

But the data trail is scattered across OEM portals, DMS exports, CRM logs, and regional spreadsheets that don't share a common structure.

 

3 places your data is working against you right now

1. Stock that ages because no one can see it


Cross-location inventory visibility is the most immediately costly data gap in any multi-rooftop group. A vehicle sits at one location for 90 days while a buyer three dealerships away is asking for exactly that configuration. Without a shared data layer, neither salesperson knows.

AutoAlert describes the problem plainly: the cars are there, just not where the salesperson has access to them. Industry data puts ideal used car turnover at 12 times per year. Aging stock drags that number down and compounds quickly at scale.

2.Offer statistics with no structure


Sales agents send quotes all week. How many went out? From which location? Which ones converted? For most Swedish dealer groups, the answer requires someone to manually compile CRM exports, cross-reference with DMS data, and produce a weekly spreadsheet that's already a week old by the time it's read.

When you can't see offer volume and conversion by agent, by location, and by model in real time, you're managing the business from memory instead of data.

3.OEM system access that breaks without warning


The Daimler internal systems that dealer groups depend on for sales data are not built for programmatic access. 2FA requirements, CSV-only exports, and periodic authentication changes mean that any automated data pipeline you build can break overnight. When it does, the fallback is manual.

This isn't a criticism of the OEM. Their systems are built for compliance and vehicle operations, not for the cross-location analytics a group at your scale needs. The gap has to be bridged somewhere. Right now, for most groups, it's bridged by people.

What small fixes actually look like in practice

The instinct when you hear "data infrastructure" is to picture a six-month project, a new system, and a budget that needs board approval. That's not the only way this works.

The most effective starting point is usually the highest-friction weekly task. For most dealer groups that's the sales reporting cycle: pulling data from the OEM portal, cleaning it, pushing it into a BI tool, distributing it. That specific workflow can be automated without replacing your DMS or your reporting tool.

One Nordic dealership group reduced their weekly reporting time by a factor of 10. The change was a scheduled data job that pulls from the OEM system, cleans the relevant fields, and feeds directly into their existing Power BI environment. No new dashboards. No new systems. The reports they already had, running without anyone touching them.

From there, the next layer is offer statistics: a lightweight interface where sales agents upload their weekly quote data, which rolls up automatically into group-level dashboards. No full CRM replacement. A single integration point that removes one manual process.

The principle is that you don't have to rebuild everything to stop losing the week. Find the workflow that costs the most time. Fix that first. Then the next one.
 

The ROI fear is real. Here's how to de-risk it.


The hesitation we hear most often from dealership groups isn't "we don't want this." It's "we've invested in things before and the ROI didn't land."

That's a fair concern. And the answer isn't to promise a percentage improvement before we've looked at your actual data flows.

The answer is to start with a scoped piece of work. Map the specific manual workflows that cost the most time. Estimate that cost in hours per week, per location, across the group. Then decide whether automating that one workflow justifies the investment. Usually the math is straightforward.

Renault Retail Group Dublin did exactly this with their after-sales absorption ratio. By moving from manual reporting to automated dashboards, their ratio improved from 70% to 82%. That's a direct profit number, traceable to a specific operational change.

Sweden's new car market contracted 7% in 2024. The used car market is volatile. In that environment, the areas where dealer groups still control their own fate are used cars, aftersales, and service. All three depend on seeing the right data at the right time. The groups building that capability now are the ones better positioned when the market recovers.

 

Talk to us about your reporting setup


If your team is spending hours every week on data tasks that should run automatically, that's worth a 30-minute conversation.

We work with companies that have the data but not the infrastructure to move it where it needs to go. We map the specific workflows that cost the most time, scope the fix, and build it. No unnecessary systems. No long discovery phases.

Book a 30-minute call and we'll tell you honestly whether we can help.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions 

How much time do dealerships typically spend on manual reporting?

A lot more than they track. TARGIT documented one dealer group spending a full week per month on data handling before any reporting could happen. McKinsey's 2025 automotive study found employees spend up to 20% of their working week searching for information rather than acting on it. Across a multi-location group, this adds up to tens of thousands of hours per year in lost productive time.

Can you automate reporting without replacing the DMS?

Yes. Most reporting automation works alongside your existing DMS. The typical approach is a scheduled data job that pulls from your current system, cleans the relevant fields, and pushes into a BI tool like Power BI. No DMS migration. No new reporting platform. Just the manual steps removed from in between.

What's the biggest data challenge for multi-location dealership groups?

Cross-location visibility. When vehicles, customer records, and offer data sit in separate systems at each location, group-level analysis requires someone to manually combine everything. Cox Automotive found 54% of dealers regularly deal with conflicting figures across sources. At group level, that means decisions made on incomplete or outdated data.

Is AI actually useful for dealership operations or mostly hype?

Both things are true. AI-powered used car valuation tools like Wayke WIP in Sweden deliver real, measurable accuracy. Natural-language reporting tools that let managers query business data in plain language are proven and available now. What is still mostly hype is fully autonomous AI sales agents and end-to-end negotiation automation. The practical wins in 2025 are in data processing, not customer-facing AI.

How does the Mercedes agency model affect data access for dealers?

It reduces it. Under the agency model, Mercedes-Benz owns the vehicle stock and invoices customers directly. Dealers earn a commission rather than a margin. This means less direct control over inventory data, pricing data, and customer relationship data. The areas where dealers still have data ownership, used cars, aftersales, and service, become proportionally more important to protect and understand.

What's a realistic first step for a dealership group that wants better reporting?

Start with the most expensive manual workflow. Map the specific task that costs the most time per week, whether that's pulling OEM sales data, compiling offer statistics, or reconciling multi-location inventory. Estimate the hours. Scope a fix for that one workflow before committing to anything larger. That scoped piece of work also gives you a baseline to measure ROI against.

Project

Cargotec

See how Kalmar Cargotec achieved 103% efficiency gains with a custom mobile app. Read the case study & learn more about the solution that supports 17 languages.

Mobile development

scroll-to-top